A number of people have pitched Drupal to me as a competitor to Joomla. One person wrote:

“When we surveyed content management systems …, Joomla was one of the ones we looked at, but on balance Drupal won out. I recently converted my … site to Drupal and brought up two other sites … on the same code base, but with very different appearance and different features on each. I am very impressed.”

I have spent some time evaluating both of these content management systems and while I have chosen to go with Joomla myself, Drupal could probably have done the job I wanted to get done. My initial post was in no way meant to imply that Drupal was not equaly as capable. There were a couple of things that swayed my vote to Joomla.

1. By the time I looked into Drupal, I already understood how Joomla worked. The argument that Drupal is easier to use therefore did not carry the water for me that it would for others and I felt like Joomla’s flexibility was probably better than Drupal’s provided I was willing to make the investment;
2. I am not scared of getting my hands dirty with PHP, MySQL, CSS and XHTML. That means that if I find an obstacle with Joomla, I have the flexibility to get into it with these technologies if I need to; and
3. I like what Joomla has done to address and caution against security issues within Joomla itself. Security is a very real consideration for any web-site and I think the Joomla team understand this. They may not have all the answers but they definitely understand the issues. You should at least look at the Joomla security site and their security forum before you implement a site using Joomla.

In fact, it is the latter point that made me realize I needed to take down my family site while I work on making sure that I have dealt with any potential security threats. It will be back up in a couple of weeks. 

In a discussion on the issue, someone I was talking to made the statement that they did not want a content management system that required a database because of the administration issues associated with it. To me, that argument does not make any sense because if you go with static HTML instead, you still have the complexity of managing the content and determining what the broken links are. With a good content management system, that process can be easily automated. So although you may not have the expense of the database maintenance, you do have the expense of the static HTML management. Most of the maintenance stuff around my 4 Joomla installations is all automated anyway and I simply check the e-mail that I get on a nightly basis to verify that the backup verification process worked. Moreover, there is so much functionality that you simply get for free that I would hate to have to write manually.

Finally, a gentleman by the name of Jeff Pilant pointed me at a web site that is absolutely invaluable on the security side of things. The site calls itself “Common Weakness Enumeration – A Community-Developed Dictionary of Software Weakness Types” and it enumerates 25 of the most dangerous mistakes that developers make that can create serious security threats in their code. This is a highly recommended read. The information is also available in PDF form and although a lot of this information is available in a number of the security books that are already out there, this is a very valuable and concise reminder.

While I can and have developed web applications, it’s not my favorite kind of development. Actually, anything that involves significant artistry is something I have a hard time doing. I am a software engineer first and foremost. So I was looking for something that would cut corners. I wanted to be able to do what I do with my blog, but on a bigger scale.

All of my web-hosting is handled by GoDaddy and I was looking through the free applications that they make available to all of their web hosting clients. Joomla! happened to be listed and I decided to do some research. What I found sounded very interesting so I had GoDaddy install Joomla on my hosting account and I experimented with it and I was very impressed with what I found.

The first thing that struck me about Joomla is that once the initial setup is done, your focus is on content. It’s not about figuring out what goes where and how to manage your site. Joomla stores its content in a MySQL database and simply applies templates to the data retrieved from the database. A lot of the work around an on-line store is taken care of for you by Joomla. Again, you can focus on the real work – the content. 

Joomla is a little confusing to get the hang of initially, but I found that working through a book on the subject made it very simple and the power that it provides is very impressive. I spent several hours working with Joomla in the evenings during the course of the last week and by the end of the week I had substantially set up 4 new web-sites. All are now ready to be used for their intended purposes and they even have the preliminary content I need them to contain. 

Joomla’s real advantage, though, lies in its extensibility. It has a number of mechanisms for extending the basic tool and although this requires some html, css and php knowledge, the mechanism is there.

I’m just starting with this tool so this is a very early comment on it, but I am very impressed with what I have seen so far. I’ll keep you posted.