Comments on: SOA… Dead???… Really???… http://www.thesoftwaregorilla.com/2009/08/soa-dead-really/ The Software Gorilla Tue, 06 Dec 2011 03:33:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: No, Ms Manes, SOA is NOT dead | The Software Gorilla http://www.thesoftwaregorilla.com/2009/08/soa-dead-really/comment-page-1/#comment-8 No, Ms Manes, SOA is NOT dead | The Software Gorilla Thu, 13 Aug 2009 05:52:03 +0000 http://www.thesoftwaregorilla.com/?p=100#comment-8 [...] an earlier post I wrote a response to a post by Anne Thomas Manes that SOA is dead. The crux of my [...] [...] an earlier post I wrote a response to a post by Anne Thomas Manes that SOA is dead. The crux of my [...]

]]> By: Miko Matsumura http://www.thesoftwaregorilla.com/2009/08/soa-dead-really/comment-page-1/#comment-6 Miko Matsumura Sun, 02 Aug 2009 14:47:08 +0000 http://www.thesoftwaregorilla.com/?p=100#comment-6 Hear Hear. I spoke on this topic at the Burton Group Catalyst conference last week in San Diego, in the "SOA is Dead" track immediately after Anne Thomas Manes. I understand the impulse to try to seperate the wheat from the chaff, as the definition of SOA got to be so vendor-driven and vague so as to cause as much harm as good. But I agree with you that to declare it dead is to throw the baby out with the bath water. Enterprise architecture is a mess, and the use of a well governed services architecture is a way to mitigate that. Nuff said, Miko Hear Hear.

I spoke on this topic at the Burton Group Catalyst conference last week in San Diego, in the “SOA is Dead” track immediately after Anne Thomas Manes.

I understand the impulse to try to seperate the wheat from the chaff, as the definition of SOA got to be so vendor-driven and vague so as to cause as much harm as good.

But I agree with you that to declare it dead is to throw the baby out with the bath water.

Enterprise architecture is a mess, and the use of a well governed services architecture is a way to mitigate that.

Nuff said,
Miko

]]>